Activity of Administrator

…the budget deficit will quickly come down, as Tax revenues flood in with aggregate demand going gang busters with immigrant flows.

To pay off the NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY DEFICIT, the Dems will again allow immigrants to flood back in, aggregate demand will take flight, after 4 stagnant years of Trumpist immigrant irrational hate, the explosion of aggregate demand will cause inflation, as businesses USED TO AVERAGE CONSUMPTION suddenly cannot readily bump up production, to cater to a explosive growth in demand. USA will return to AVERAGE 3-4% NATIONAL GROWTH PER YEAR.

Here is an educated guess. TRUMP WILL REMOVE 10 TO 20 MILLION IMMIGRANTS, NO MORE IMMIGRANTS WILL ARRIVE, AGGREGATE DEMAND WILL TANK, HE WILL BLOW OUT THE BUDGET DEFICIT WITH HUGE TAX CUTS TO MOST WEALTHY CONSUMERS WHO ARE ALSO POLITICAL DONORS TO HIM → GROWTH WILL LOW BALL AROUND ZERO GROWTH, BUT THE BUDGET DEFICIT WILL ESCALATE FRIGHTENINGLY…the Republicans will be voted out, because people don't like a stagnant economy with a huge budget deficit, that signals failure of economic management.

A static national economy spends about the same…aggregate demand is roughly static…if you want dynamic growth in ‘aggregate demand’, you need to import consumer immigrants to spend big on setting up a household…IS WHAT MAKES ECONOMIC GROWTH, by stimulating aggregate demand.

ECONOMIC HISTORY WILL KNOW IT AS THE ‘TRUMP SLUMP’

If a President wants Legislative power, he or she is recommended to quit office and gain Sovereign elector consent to join the Congress and share collective representative sovereignty, with the fail-safe of collective consultative representative public policy decision-making of Congress, that is the basis of Legislative Sovereignty in a responsible and accountable, Democratic State.

Nor can a Legislature delegate its Sovereignty to a peak Administrator, as the Voter shares the individual Sovereignty of the collective Sovereignty of Congress and only the voter in revolutionary action or Referendum can delegate their individual consent and Legislative sovereignty to a Peak administrator to rule in legislative decree, hidden from the open deliberations of a consultative Congress, Congress inherently needs to constantly reference and consult the Sovereign Voter, by constant reference to the individual Sovereignty of the Voter.

A President cannot act like a King that rules by legislative decree, a President has guideline powers set by the Sovereign Legislature. The intent of Legislation is set by Courts as the proxy of Sovereign Legislature Congress, not by a power hungry peak administrator in the office of President.

An electors vote for Congress sets the State of Sovereignty in a State. An electors vote for a President sets the state of official management of purely administrative powers in the State, there is no Legislative mandate for pure administrative function.

The Congress is SOVEREIGN in a Democracy. A President is SUBORDINATE to the legislative powers of Congress, which are interpreted and enforced by Courts, who are the administrative proxy of the Powers of Congress, to outline and delineate Presidential powers of Administration. Courts share the SOVEREIGNTY OF CONGRESS as proxy of Congressional power. Obstructing or intimidating Courts by an administration, is a subversion of purely administrative powers, it is a sedition of State.

Courts act to enforce, outline and guideline CONGRESSIONAL POWERS assigned to a Government administration, peak managed by a President. Criticising and obstructing interpretative Courts administering Justice on behalf of Congress, for the purpose of acquiring extra powers beyond CONGRESSIONAL PERMIT AND LEGISLATION is an intended subversion and Seditious conspiracy of the powers of administration assigned to a purely administrative Government, actionable by the Congress as a seditious conspiracy, to further a tyrannous personal agenda, often alluded to by revelatory Trump semi-humorous statements, revealing a criminal hidden agenda.

What has been truly shameful, is that Miranda Rights are systematically not being applied to arrested ICE and protester suspects, reveals systematic Legal abuse of arrest powers and process together with an intent and command behavior to minimize free speech by use of arrest powers, by Presidential fiat, command or directive…which is substantial grounds for impeachment of a President for systematic abuse and Ultra-Vires of powers. President is an ‘administrator’ under aegis of Congressional specific mandated administrative powers, a President does not decide what his powers are, he cannot legislate or allocate powers unto himself, ONLY CONGRESS CAN STATE, OUTLINE AND GUIDELINE POWERS. If a President deliberately or ignorantly exceeds his powers systematically and intentionally, he is in criminal abuse of his assigned powers, abusing powers of office for pursuing an illegal personal agenda, that is 'criminal acts', when put in practice.

Front-line officers need to be tutored in Free Speech fundamental public rights guidelines, if not, the Command is liable for breach of duty of care and liable to suit in tort for breach of civil rights enshrined in the first amendment protection of free speech.

This is consistent with Miranda rights for arrested suspects, it is a shameful reflection on the Legal system that protest rights have not been enunciated in case law in this day and age. Trumpist Neo-Nazism is now exploiting the lack of Legal protest guidelines, to arrest people for political reasons of illegally silencing, legally protected free speech.

I SUGGEST LEGAL GUIDELINES FOR PEACEFUL PROTEST IS 2 HOURS OF PROTEST IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD AFTER WHICH FIRST A MOVE-ON ORDER MUST BE GIVEN 3 TIMES, THEN POSSIBLE ARREST FOR TRESPASS OR DISTURBING THE PEACE. MOVE-ON OR ARREST BEFORE A 2 HOUR INTERVAL OF PROTEST IS ASSAULT, AND BREACH OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENSHRINED IN 1ST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMAND NEED TO NEGOTIATE REASONABLE INTERVAL OF PEACEFUL PROTEST IN LINE WITH ENSHRINED FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF PUBLIC PROTEST only after reasonable interval of public protest are people liable to move-on or arrest for trespass in a public building, is a VALID LEGAL GUIDELINE, or face punitive liability in tort for wrongful denial of civil rights, enshrined in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.

PEACEFUL PROTEST IS PROTECTED BY 1ST AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS, arrest of peaceful protesters is Ultra Vires and illegal assault. Law enforcement will be liable in suit for breach of civil rights if they arrest peaceful protesters, it is a Law Enforcement officer's duty to refuse unreasonable requests to arrest peaceful protesters, or you WILL BE LIABLE IN CIVIL SUIT.