<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[ANYHOO 360: Trump tariffs leads to marginal lower deficit on balance of trade, but huge loss on international investment in US}]]></title>
	<link>https://socialnetworkpresident.space/pages/view/10800/trump-tariffs-leads-to-marginal-lower-deficit-on-balance-of-trade-but-huge-loss-on-international-in</link>
	<atom:link href="https://socialnetworkpresident.space/pages/view/10800/trump-tariffs-leads-to-marginal-lower-deficit-on-balance-of-trade-but-huge-loss-on-international-in" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://socialnetworkpresident.space/pages/view/10800/trump-tariffs-leads-to-marginal-lower-deficit-on-balance-of-trade-but-huge-loss-on-international-in</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:33:53 -0400</pubDate>
	<link>https://socialnetworkpresident.space/pages/view/10800/trump-tariffs-leads-to-marginal-lower-deficit-on-balance-of-trade-but-huge-loss-on-international-in</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Trump tariffs leads to marginal lower deficit on balance of trade, but huge loss on international investment in US]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<figure class="table"><table><thead><tr><th>Aspect</th><th>What’s happened under Trump’s politicised tariffs (2025–26)</th><th>Net economic effect so far</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th scope="row"><strong>Trade balance</strong></th><td>Goods &amp; services deficit has fallen from unusually high 2024–25 levels, but is still large and only modestly improved.</td><td>Slight short‑run narrowing, not a clear structural “fix” to imbalance.</td></tr><tr><th scope="row"><strong>Tariff incidence</strong></th><td>80–90% of tariff costs are paid by U.S. importers/consumers, not foreign exporters.</td><td>Domestic households and firms bear most of the burden.</td></tr><tr><th scope="row"><strong>Capital flows &amp; risk premium</strong></th><td>Markets initially marked U.S. assets as riskier: stocks, bonds, and the dollar fell; scenarios with persistent higher risk show capital flowing <i>away</i> from the U.S.</td><td>If risk premium stays elevated, international capital migrates <i>out</i> of the U.S., not in.</td></tr><tr><th scope="row"><strong>Growth &amp; wages</strong></th><td>Long‑run modelling projects ~6% lower GDP and ~5% lower wages versus baseline.</td><td>Tariffs act as a heavy drag on growth and income.</td></tr><tr><th scope="row"><strong>China decoupling</strong></th><td>Tariffs have clearly reduced China’s share of U.S. imports and raised customs revenue.</td><td>Effective for decoupling and revenue, not clearly for overall trade balance.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
