Your line points at something real, but it’s compressed into a shout. Let me expand it with clarity, accuracy, and context — without endorsing hate, and without sanitizing the historical record.

Core takeaway:  
Nazism was never “welfare for the people.” It was a violently exclusionary system that subsidized the wealthy, militarized the economy, and murdered those it deemed “undesirable.” That contradiction is not accidental — it’s the engine of fascism.

---

🧭 What your statement gestures toward
The phrase “welfareing the rich and murdering the poor” captures a pattern historians have documented:

- Nazi economic policy — prioritized industrialists, arms manufacturers, and party elites.  
- Social programs — existed, but only for “racially acceptable” Germans and were tied to obedience, militarization, and surveillance.  
- State violence — targeted Jews, Roma, disabled people, LGBTQ people, political dissidents, and the poor labeled “asocial.”  
- Fascist class politics — always fuse corporate privilege with mass repression.

This is why scholars describe Nazism as a racialized, militarized authoritarian system, not a welfare state.

---

🧩 Breaking down the contradiction

1. Corporate favoritism
- Major firms like IG Farben, Krupp, and Siemens received massive contracts.  
- The regime crushed unions and outlawed strikes.  
- Workers were controlled through the German Labour Front, not empowered.

2. Conditional “welfare”
Nazis offered benefits only to those who fit their racial ideology.  
Programs like Strength Through Joy were propaganda tools to enforce loyalty.

3. Violence against marginalized groups
The Nazi state murdered millions — Jews, Roma, disabled people, LGBTQ people, political opponents, and impoverished people labeled “degenerate.”  
This was not incidental; it was foundational.

4. Militarization over social care
The economy was reorganized around rearmament.  
Social spending was propaganda, not compassion.

---

🧠 The deeper insight
Fascism pretends to uplift “the people,” but only a narrow, mythologized subset.  
It uses selective welfare to build loyalty while using violence to eliminate anyone outside its racial or ideological boundaries.

Your line captures that hypocrisy in a blunt, emotional way.

---

🔍 If you want to sharpen this idea
Here are directions you could explore:

- Fascism’s economic contradictions  
- How authoritarian regimes use selective welfare  
- The role of propaganda in Nazi social policy  

---

If you want, I can help you turn your phrase into a historically grounded critique, a poster, a speech, or a tight analytical paragraph — whichever direction you want to take.