Administrator's wire posts

AFL FINAL BEGGARS BELIEF, NO WOMAN COMMENTATOR IN SIGHT, I suggest women boycott the AFL final, for the NRL final next week when we will surely get at least two front line women reporters.

@BritneySpears ୧✿‿‿✿୨

(ꗞ◞ ꗞ)

SAMANTHA ARMYTAGE: do you think lightning can strike twice ? VALOUR: If its got a good Union !

‘Shake it Off’ is a Max Martin and Shellback Uber Beat bought from the Swedish producer duo, paid by Borchetta, so Tay was fibbing when she said it was her originality, its Euro pop, propping up the tundra that has become US Pop music after Spears and Jlo, remitted to retirement and even then, Spears sterling post breakdown effort, at revelatory or confessional “Femme Fatale”, was also a Dr Dre creation, which is another Euro-pop creation.

[AI Overview]…Taylor Swift collaborated with Swedish producers Max Martin and Shellback on her new album, The Life of a Showgirl. She reunited with them in Stockholm, Sweden, to write and record the album during her Eras Tour. Martin and Shellback have previously worked with Swift on hits like "Shake It Off" and "Blank Space". Key Collaborators: Max Martin: A legendary Swedish songwriter and producer known for creating numerous pop hits. Shellback: A Swedish multi-instrumentalist and producer who is a frequent collaborator with Max Martin. Details of the Collaboration: Swift spent time in Stockholm, Sweden, writing and recording the album. This partnership marks a reunion for Swift and the Swedish producers, who have worked together on several of her most successful songs. Their previous collaborations include hits such as "Shake It Off," "Blank Space," and "...Ready for it?".

Taylor Swift is ordering Uber Beats from Martin and Shellback, for her derivative effort for 'Tayls of a Showgirl'

[AI REWRITE] Women's capacity for emotional discernment contributes to their navigation of life's complexities, potentially aiding in the reconciliation of conflicting values.

Women are naturally adapted to emotional discernment for progress in life by virtue of their ability to reconcile evil and morality.

[AI REWRITE] A traditional view suggests a division of labor where men focus on action and women specialize in emotional intelligence. This perspective posits that women's emotional discernment guides men, leading to stability and success, as evidenced by the Sociological research evidence of normative higher success rates of married men compared to deviant addicted, deviant mentally ill or deviant same sex single men. In this framework, men provide for women and their families in exchange for their emotional labor. This model is presented as an optimal, sustainable system rooted in systemic natural gender roles evidenced in ecosystems parallel to human.

Men should do things, women should do nothing and only feel everything, then transfer her feelings to the feelingless men, so we have a very neat division of labour that nature envisaged with men specialising in choice action and women specialising in discerning and carefully chosen feelings, crafted for otherwise men with wild or inappropriate feelings, is why married men do better in life than single men, who invariably end up in rehab or prison, without the emotional discernment of a woman…men thank and pay women with provision for her and their family. Not heteronormative, more like objective sustainable optimum, sanctified by the standard sustainable operation of natural systems of gendered division of labour in life.

Absolutism, if it is a fact, is relative to a second absolutism, or there is no reality and no material reality, in the Universe.

There is no 'meaning' ipso facto, absolutism is a symptom of ignorance of practical relativity.

An utterance or literary fragment has a purpose, not a meaning.

Some have meaning in life, some have purpose in life. The former narcissist, the latter practical and normative.

[AI REWRITE] 'Initiatives gain purpose through learning from errors.'

NOTHING HAS A REASON, UNTIL EVERYTHING IS A LESSON BY MISTAKE IN AN INITIATIVE.

[AI REWRITE] Men often misinterpret women's use of provocative attire, makeup, and jewelry. Rather than viewing these choices as evidence of mental instability rooted in masculinist conceptions, they should be understood as a calculated strategy for attracting attention while upholding the security of monogamous relationships. This demonstrates women's adeptness at managing contradictory desires, risks, and rewards in life. Men, typically focused on practical provision and protection as task-oriented workers, may lack this skill in balancing conflicting impulses, particularly in relation to promiscuity. Women, as experts in beauty practices, are effectively "price makers" in the realm of attraction, while men who prioritize honesty through a lack of attention to appearance and limited sartorial choices may find themselves at a disadvantage.

Men perceive women's cognitive dissonance between provocative dressing, makeup and jewelry as supporting a masculinist conception of women as mentally unstable, not as a calculus of recognition for beauty while maintaining the relative safety of monogamy, which in fact shows women are able to juggle contradictory impulses and risks and benefits in life, life skilled, that men, professionally skilled, are not able to juggle as the provider for family as a task focused worker, focused on practical provision and protection rather than the impulsive satisfaction of promiscuity, that men are price takers when women are more focused and expert in beauty routines, p[rice makers in the attraction of beauty, than men attempting to show their honesty to women with lack of beauty routines and ordinary and limited choices in clothing, hairstyle and adornment.