Wire post by Administrator

[AI REWRITE] …. In situations involving a conflict of rights between a business and a valued vulnerable individual, such as an indigent or disabled person, the well-being of the individual should take precedence. Consider the instance of a concierge care business with a 31-day termination notice period. If an NDIS client is transitioning to a self-managed villa within two weeks, a conflict arises. Given that NDIS funding typically covers only one concurrent support invoice, would the client be compelled to forgo care for two weeks while the concierge care service adheres to its 31-day notice period, effectively being paid for services not rendered? It is important to note that invoicing NDIS for services not provided constitutes fraud, irrespective of contractual stipulations.