Skip to main content
Log in

All wire posts

    • Administrator
      By Administrator
      "2 mice got stuck in a bucket of cream, the first one gave up, the second continued until she churned the cream to butter and climbed out"
      • Administrator
        By Administrator
        @TaylorSwift13 @BritneySpears if you two were less fishy, centrally dreamy and more womanly, you may get some passionate servility from me
        • Administrator
          By Administrator
          Poor Taylor, when I first told her about Victoria Park Racing [v] Taylor [CWLTH] she tried to read it, and it was so turgid and muddy she couldnt get past one paragraph, now amazed I simplify it to a tweet.
          • Administrator
            By Administrator
            Because Taylor Swift is a citizen of the United States, enforcement of her rights is in the US jurisdiction, which does not agree she has any privacy rights to enforce, where in Australia, Privacy is well protected and Victoria Park Racing [v] Taylor may well have been legislated out of common Law existence. So what I do is possibly illegal in my jurisdiction in Aussie, but Taylor Swift has no standing to sue or obtain injunction to protect her privacy because her governments Justice system says she has no enforceable right to Privacy, especially against an Aussie who does not reside stateside, which protects my right to satisfy my curiousity almost any way I please.
            • Administrator
              By Administrator
              In 1988 I argued at Common Law, a privacy right existed in Victoria Park Racing that arose as part of the natural bundle of rights in real property, and That Victoria Park could have got an injunction to stop the broadcasting of what was happening at the race course "spectacle". What complicates that cognitive dissonance by me, is that SCOTUS has ruled recently that in the United States there is no inherent right of privacy except for MAYBE the privacy of marital interactions. So I have advocated for Taylors privacy from Taylor “Angles”, but SCOTUS has ruled that Taylor Swift has no right to privacy especially as a public ‘spectacle’, and Bravid as Taylor ‘Angles’ is fully entitled to narrate her private life to the adoring curiousity of her fans.
              • Administrator
                By Administrator
                The Magic is, my thesis that Taylor [v] Victoria Park Racing was wrong was rejected by my Property Law lecturer Gerard Rowe in 1988 as academically insufficient, when I dissented, I was not re-enrolled for law studies, as psychotic.
                • Administrator
                  By Administrator
                  Victoria Park Racing Club would be the appellant management of Taylor Swift, as they own her musical franchise as performer management
                  • Administrator
                    By Administrator
                    I would be arguing I am Taylor ‘Angles’ and she is Taylor Swift and by the neighbour principle enshrined in Christianity, Taylor should love her neighbour and not try and stop him viewing and commentating on the spectacle that is her life, as a loved neighbour.
                    • Administrator
                      By Administrator
                      I am magically relying on Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) [CWLTH] to protect myself from suit by Taylor Swift alleging intrusion into her private life, by my correlation. I would be arguing I am Taylor, or known on radio as "Angles", the neighbour to Victoria Park Racing Club and I am allowed to view the spectacle of Taylors life, because she has no property rights in her spectacle to be able to exclude me as a property right.
                      • Administrator
                        By Administrator
                        Tay is fuck lucky, where Victoria was hard up, because Tay is a dollish ditz with a voluble intelligence and Victoria was vinegar and Frankishly unsightly obtuse Conservative.
                        • Administrator
                          By Administrator
                          Tays momster is so dumb, she tried to sell her pop music daughter as “young Victoria” even though Tay was a promiscuous serial dater and Victoria was sexually repressed, Tay set fire to a sexual revolution among young people not having children or marrying til late in the 30 something or other. I had to ridicule it or else Tay would have lost half her audience that she was repressed ruling class Monarch, not liberated modern woman.
                          • Administrator
                            By Administrator
                            Taylors spinning Apple trope, in her seductive ‘Blank Space’ hit about all the space in Musks money vaulted head, now maybe she can spin a football on her finger in a prospective music vid…when Kelce forgives her for fucking up the honeymoon